All anonymity systems require large numbers of people to send traffic, or perhaps more accurately, the fewer people send traffic, the less anonymity the system can possibly provide. This is particularly a problem in setting up a system everyone has an incentive to use. Essentially, parties that value anonymity highly need people who value it less to use the system anyway in order to provide cover traffic.
This paper (also available on Freehaven's site), suggests ways of using various HTTP trickery to get people to send traffic, and to carry other people's traffic, on the system without even knowing they're doing so.
This not using obscure loopholes. It's using things like redirects, cookies and JavaScript that pretty much everyone has enabled and which would be a royal hassle to turn off. On the other hand, you would have to visit particular sites controlled by the system.
It's not clear wow much of a practical problem this is, but it's yet another thing to keep in mind when pondering just exactly how secure the web might be.
What good is half a language?
4 years ago
No comments:
Post a Comment